Nanohd vs ac pro reddit. Compare that to the AC-Pro which has 22/22dBm.

 

Nanohd vs ac pro reddit. 4Ghz space and too much bandwidth over 20Mhz). MU-MIMO And The Future of WiFi The poe injector that comes with the nanoHD unfortunately will not properly power the edgerouterx. I’d go with the nanoHD. . My experiences with my AC-LR led me to the conclusion that LR models are really not fit for homes. Unless you are maxing out # of devices (200 wifi connections) 3x3 MIMO and 4x4 MU-MIMO are not going to affect your speeds that greatly. It blinks and does not boot up. More and more devices has Wi-Fi 6 capability, so makes no sense to plan for obsolescence. He recommended those because they have better gain (8db vs 3db), and more directional so we better to point down the aisles. In my small apartment I consistently got 800 Mbps within line of sight with the Extreme, but roughly only half of that with the AC Pro. 4G - 11, ht20, 23dbm (power) 5G - 48, vht80, 26dbm Need to add another on the west end. 8Gb. 11a, but IIRC it doesn’t work like that any more. I have both and if you are fine with Wifi5, the NanoHD is a very good replacement for the AC-Pro. However, much to my joy, switching from UAP-AC-PRO to NanoHD mounted in the exact same spot greatly improved my multiple outdoor mounted 2. nanoHD wireless uplink was very unstable in the first firmwares. 4GHz covers a huge portion of my front and back yards. Hell you’d probably be fine with an AC Lite actually. nanoHD has higher uplink speeds because it's a Wave2 device. I’m not sure if an AP will do g and ac at the same time, or the lowest protocol sets the speed for the network. 4ghz is the same as the LITE. However the edgerouter x will work in that configuration with an AC-LR. I have two FlexHD's and an AC Pro. The FlexHD and NanoHD are indeed the same hardware, just with different form factor and different antennas. The Pro is a 3x3 and has been absolutely the workhorse of our integration business. The EAP245 is the rough equivalent of the AC-PRO, NOT the nanoHD. 4/5GHz. They both have similar transmit power, but the 5Ghz antenna is nearly twice as sensitive on the AC-Pro than the U6-Lite, which will help with range. 2. floor) or if I should do 2 APs each floor. The spec that got me to go with the Pro over the NanoHD was the (rated) 2. (I’d also look at replacing our very tired Cisco SRW2048 with a Unifi switch, probably a 24-POE-250. 1. $179 for a nanoHD is kind of a steal. If you want better range or better 2. The AC Pro is better in every way except throughput when close by. Sep 6, 2021 · UniFi 6 Pro - firmware version 5. From what I've seen, the nanoHD is newer and has better 5 GHz performance, but doesn't do as well at 2. UAP-AC-LITE: Cheapest, good 2. If you have modern devices that support multiple radio chains on 5 GHz, you can get some fast throughput . I have a nanoHD, a Pro and an AC LR. Just not sure I want to spend a grand on all that stuff if there ain’t a guarantee that I can get not only the range but the speeds. Stick to something tried and proven, either nanoHD or ac pro. Compact 802. Any advice on config, channel plan or next steps is greatly appreciated. I have a dedicated iot VLAN I broadcast that over an iot SSID I do not seperate 5ghz and 2. I picked up a U6 -LR a little over a month ago when they popped up. If you have more devices on 5ghz, the nanoHD would be best due to higher 5ghz speeds of 1733Mbps vs the AC Pro’s 1300Mbps. We do have a detached garage that extends into the backyard with windows that face the yard. No it will not be more future proof though, WiFi 6 is out and many devices are now supporting that. While I am really happy with the performance of UAP-LRs, the Outdoor+ units seem to be very slow even with low loads (up to 10 clients) and in one particular spot I seem to get a lot of clients. Or check it out in the app stores   but the AC-PRO is the better comparison to the NANOHD. 3af Same mount as UAP AC Lite… Oddly, years ago, I discovered that with my old outdoor 2. I will let the others who probably have more in-depth knowledge of which is best when comparing the U6 Pro vs the Nano HD; I just figured that, if you were happy with the old Pro, just made practical sense to move to the new Pro. What's type of speed I will get with the UAP AC LR or nanoHD ? Thanks by advance for any help. 4GHz. If you are sure that EVERY connecting device is 5Ghz, the nano is a bit faster (1733 Mbps versus 1300 Mbps) but I bet the OP only has gigabit ethernet at most (and switches, and routers and modems etc. 4 and 5GHz, and the 2. No issues just worked. a FCC Registration ID change hit fccid. 4GHZ than the LITE. South end: AC LR 2. While WiFi 6 isn't a must for, I'd feel like doing it now rather than changing later. 4ghz and 5ghz UAP-AC-LR: A little bit more expensive but should provide a little bit better range for 2. 4 Ghz antenna hardware but inferior processor. UniFi-AC-Pro: Pros and Cons. iPerf server: Qotom mini desktop running pfSense, or Mac Mini connected via Ethernet. I have two nanoHD's in my house and one ac-pro and find the nanoHD's to be slightly faster and are able to better handle 500mb+ internet connections than the ac-pro's (depending on the device you are using my speed tests are typically run using my iphone 8+). In a mesh network one radio is used to talk to the other access point (creating a wireless bridge), and the other is used to connect to the clients. I was initially thinking about getting another AC LR and get them both on south and north ends. The AC Pro simply isn’t capable of more than ~450 in iPerf tests. 4GHz performance. 500/60 is what I currently have. 4ghz performance or need the bridge/secondary Ethernet port on the Pro, that's the only reason to get the Pro. So I guess just another consideration for future-proofing for a future that might not be too far off. That being said, if your needs are not “fastest Wi-Fi on the block”, both will fulfill your needs perfectly fine. UniFi Switch Lite 8 PoE - firmware version 5. I built my system with a NanoHD back in June. The nano will broadcast a g/n/ac network, and the clients and APs the maximum protocol they can use. 4 Ghz WIFI IP cameras reliability (well, not human noticeable but no more couple of 10 or 20 second dropouts per day reported in Blue The Pro was a transitional product (Wave 1 AC) the doesn't even support all the features the AC standard supports like MU-MIMO. Can’t go wrong with either Stay away from EA items that were suggested. I’d go AC-Lite or U6 Lite out of EA; lowest cost option but an incredible bang for the buck. ) in their home anyway, so the theoretical different in 5 Ghz speed "The nanoHD also has a more advanced MU-MIMO and is more “futureproof” than the AC Pro. Are there any other differences worth considering? I think their "long range" models are deceiving. I was also having a lot of 2. I only have one Nano left, the other two were replaced by a U6-LR and a U6-Pro (which doesn't have great firmware yet for 2. The Mesh Pro has 3 dual-band antennas, making it capable of reaching higher speeds. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. The U6-Lite has 2x2 MU-MIMO, which means I went the other way and ordered a new NanoHD the other day to replace a failing AC Pro. 5 Ghz performance is significantly better with the Nano. Now, I'm thinking to add an UAP AC LR or an nanoHD to my Unifi setup. It also has 4x4 MIMO vs 3x3 for the AC-Pro (on the 5G band). ) We’re a smallish independent school (275 students PreK-12), so a medium-density environment that might be getting a bit denser in the future as we I was looking at the nanoHD, but I'm very concerned about mounting/coverage, because I really just want to mount things in my basement so I don't have to run a cable up into the attic for an AP for the main living floor. 4 GHz. Range is significantly improved and throughput is orders of magnitude higher. Almost all 2. UniFi-NanoHD. My use case is single AP, for now, and that shifted importance to bandwidth at range. An AC-M or M-Pro would work (the M-Pro is huge though). No problems related to it. People buy them thinking they can increase the coverage of their network, when in reality most of the time you aren't running 100% power on them anyways. AC Mesh Pro I have a Nano HD and AC Pro inside the house but get a fairly weak signal on my deck and backyard, so I was thinking of putting another AP out there. You'd saturate your Cat6 bandwidth before your really start feeling 3x3 vs 4x4 difference For my money, AC Probably because of range. The AC-Mesh-Pro is an AC1750 Wi-Fi 5 AP, offering more performance than the non-pro model. Running Ethernet out there is kind of a pain so I was thinking about trying something using wireless uplink. It is harder to hide, but the additional antenna gain provide Hello guys, I am planning wifi upgrade in a hotel that uses many UAP-LRs and several UAP-Outdoor+ 2. Windows 10 PC with Intel AX210 Wi-Fi adapter (2x2 Wi-Fi 6) Also, depending on how your house is laid out, it's quite unlikely you'd need more than two or three of either model -- my UAP-AC-Lite, and now my UAP-nanoHD (purchased it while it was in the Early Access store for $161) blanket my entire 1080sq/ft home in both 2. The first nanoHD I order was dead on arrival. 4GHz than all the xxxHD family. If I had to guess, AC-Lite and AC-LR are gonna be next on the EoL chopping block since their Wifi 6 counterparts are in the EA store. 4G - 6, ht20, 23dbm (power) 5G - 44, vht80, 26dbm East end: NanoHD 2. In the early access store, I saw a wifi 6 lite device too but the NanoHD on paper has more throughput because of 4X4 MIMO vs 2X2 MIMO, so what's the point there? Archived post. The AC-Mesh-Pro is big enough that it could act as a lunch tray. 43. nanoHD is also much more expensive. com Dec 10, 2018 · I've narrowed my choices down to the AP AC PRO and the nanoHD. Don't get them, they are slow, old, and don't support wireless AC. Compare that to the AC-Pro which has 22/22dBm. The EAP245 or AC-PRO offers only 3x3 80 MHz over the 2x2 80 MHz of the EAP225 or AC-LITE. The AC-Pro also has 3x3 MIMO, which means it can send 3 different packets simultaneously to the same client, or use beamforming to increase signal quality. The HD is much more expensive and not nearly as common. UniFi AC-Lite, AC-Pro, AC-M, AC-M-Pro, AC-IW, AC-HD - firmware version 5. Keep in mind that each uplink hop degrades speed by at least 50%. Stable, fast and physically feels a bit sturdier than the others. 5Ghz was available with Wireless N as well, and that's what differentiates the UAP-Pro from the regular UAP models. I don’t see any real world difference between the AC-Lite, AC-Pro or NanoHD. For Ubiquiti lots of buggy firmware, the controller runs on a Windows VM and the software runs in the user context so if you log off the controller shuts down (also means someone else can't start the controller back up). The AC-LR has TX levels of 24/22dBm for 2. I don't see any difference in 2. Pros： It has a good network topology and can cover a wide area UBNT specs say 450 Mbps radio rate for UAP-AC-Pro vs 300 Mbps for NanoHD. 4ghz, then the AC Pro would be better suited for your needs since it has the higher throughput on that radio. As a bonus, the nanoHD has the brightest blue light of the three of them, which I prefer. 11ac Wave2 MU-MIMO Enterprise Access Point 2x2 MIMO on 2. 4GHz devices are only 1x1 or 2x2 anyways, so you’d never take advantage of a 3x3. But the 3 antennas make it also a good base station for your outdoor mesh network. 4Ghz issues on my network due to wifi cams, but the AC-Pro didn't solve (cluttered 2. Either choose Wifi 6 or the last (and fully) Wifi 5 AP. 4Ghz devices, but works If Wi-Fi is only gonna be used for internet, a Pro or maybe even a Lite will be ok but for me, the difference in cost isn’t great enough to make the Lite or Pro more compelling than the nanoHD except for large-scale deployments where the $$ adds up. I have had projects where we went back in and "upgraded" to the NanoHD from the Pro and we had to supplement a few locations due to the Nano not being able to cover the range of the PRO AP. No reason to pay to beta test a product , and Wifi6 so new still not much out there utilizing it. Can't speak to the U6+ but I just upgraded 1x NanoHD & 1x AC Pro to 2x U6 Pro's in my house and it made a huge difference. 4Ghz IP cameras, the Nano HD also outperformed the AC Pro AP which technically has better 2. Had a recommendation on Reddit to get their router-Switch- 2 AC PRO- and 2 Mesh units. Mesh bridge between the WAP's went from 1. On paper, it appears, but in real world it doesn’t. Warehouse is actually 360k sq feet, and he was recommending the UAP-AC-M-Pro, not the AC Pro. Or check it out in the app stores I swapped from AC Pro to NanoHD units a year or two ago and saw a AC Mesh vs. That may or may not be important, depending on the type of clients to include IoT and/or Apple devices with fancy WiFi radios. Compare Ubiquiti Networks nanoHD vs Ubiquiti Networks UAP-AC-PRO Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Keyboard Navigation Professional: AC-Mesh-Pro. Dec 31, 2022 · The narrow canal for the LED is also a bit wider which means that the light will shine brighter on the NanoHD and it still has the same role as on the UAP-AC-PRO: if the LED is white, then the AP is not yet configured and waiting to be paired, otherwise, if the LED gets solid blue, then the device has been successfully added to a network and it is working properly; when the LED rapidly flashes the U6-LR GA edition uses the AC-Pro's mounting footprint, it even includes a Pro Mount. Wireless Clients. The UAP-Pro is very different from the UAP-AC-Pro, and the specs listed are correct on that site. See full list on mbreviews. Jan 1, 2020 · AC-nanoHD: Newer than the Pro, this is the cheapest 802. The difference between MU-MIMO performance makes a big difference between the UAP-AC-Pro (which only has Single User/SU-MIMO) and the UAP-nanoHD. Ubiquiti have this new nanoHD that looks similar to the AC-PRO, have a smaler size and higher speed (1300 vs. FCC ID: U6-LRR" Dec 9, 2019 · I am preparing to replace my older Aerohive setup (8 APs, a mix of 121s and 130s) with Unifi and am wondering if I should go with AC or HD. Verdict - save your money. Compare Ubiquiti Networks UAP-AC-PRO vs Ubiquiti Networks nanoHD vs Ubiquiti Networks UAP-XG vs Ubiquiti Networks UAP-AC-HD Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers The NanoHD is a smaller and more recent spec (Wifi5 Gen 2) compared to the AC Pro. Best bet is to add an AP outside, I just added a FlexHD in the back garden, but as the other poster said, it’s early access only (and out of stock). 4G. Skip the U6-Lite and just buy a NanoHD if you aren't a bleeding edge type and don't anticipate the majority of the devices in your house to be WiFi 6 in the near future, because the NanoHD moderately outperforms it in every other aspect and even achieves higher throughput on a 3x3 AC 16" Macbook Pro client than the U6-Lite can accomplish with a Personally I’d go for the NanoHD or AC-Pro over the AC-Lite. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Dec 3, 2021 · This improvement increases overall Internet speed and allows more customers to use a single access point with the same level of performance. 2Gb to 3. The U6 didn't seem to have the same range. 3x3 on client devies is uncommon meaning the EAP245 or AC-PRO are often not worth it Do I need an actual wireless router (like the Dream Router) if I was just going to get something like a Switch Pro 24 PoE and then have other wireless access points throughout the house? For example, I could put on (maybe a 6LR) in the master closet where the switch is, then two 6IW-LR in the far bedrooms. It doesn’t have removable antennas, but instead comes with high-gain (8 dBi) antennas built-in. The radiation patterns say that the FlexHD is better on the sides while the NanoHD is better on the top (makes sense given expected placement). Jun 28, 2018 · If a lot of your devices are only capable of running on 2. Smart plugs, Alexas, Google homes, and WiFi calling, all suck so much when not connected to the AC Pro. 11ac Wave 2 access point they make. I also went with the AC-Pro since, eventually, I intent to upgrade to AX when those become available and the Pro was cheaper in the meantime. Also, I think it's a little cheaper, newer than the Nano, is sort of more futureproof (I imagine) since it's Wifi 6. Reply reply I have a school with only AC-HD, and a school later installed with only NanoHD. 4 GHz performance isn’t as strong as the Pro, however. Nothing ever connects to either of the FlexHD's unless completely out of range of the AC Pro, and when I reboot the AC Pro to force devices to connect to the FlexHD's they get really unreliable WiFi. As for mixed ac/g, I’m not sure what you mean. Most devices have a stronger & faster connection now across PC's, mobile devices & IoT. The Pro is the longer range AP. I looked at the specs for both, and on paper the NanoHD is similar (to the 6 LR) or better (to the 6 Lite) in almost every aspect (not WiFi 6 obviously). For us the Aruba PoC just worked. 4ghz I set the access point to prefer 5 gigahertz A couple of years ago, I would have said nanoHD, but these days I’d get the U6-Pro (or lite/LR). The old Pro is better at 2. UniFi-NanoHD AP vs. The difference between the EA and GA is that the GA is actually the device that was planned to be the U6-Pro. 71. io last week showing "U6-Pro changed to U6-LRR" so on your U6-LR you'll see "M/N: U6-LR. Right now I think most if not all nanoHD issues are solved. A common suggestion is upgrading to the AC HD to Ok had alot of the initial info wrong, just had a call with the unifi engineer. 4Ghz versus 450 Mbps for the AC-Pro. The max speed on the AC-M is about 300Mbps, but should be good enough for Netflix etc. 4ghz 4x4 MIMO on 5ghz 802. FlexHD's are lovely, and have addresable RGB, but stock is much harder to come by, and ultimately why we switched. UAP-AC-PRO: Most expensive, provides a bit better range for 5ghz and higher throughout, but 2. In comparison, NanoHD AP is the clear winner. Dec 28, 2018 · I'm ordering a access point today/monday to test out if 1 AP covers enough of the rooms (entire 1. I did a direct replacement - same mounting location. The nanoHD is WiFi 5. The only common devices that benefit from the 245 or AC-PRO are Macbook pros and some high end iMacs. nanoHD: $220 AC-PRO: $170 AC-LITE: $120 We don't have that many devices on the go at a time really, so I'm not sure if the extra money is worth it for the nano or the PRO. The same devices in the same locations would have a harder time The specs make it out to seem like the U6 Pro can move twice as much data as the U6 LR (4800Mbps vs 2400Mbps), but won’t the rates eventually be bottlenecked by the 1G ethernet port? (If I remember right, those advertised theoretical speeds are added up upload & download speeds, and the 1G ethernet port is measured 1G up and 1G down full duplex). I then ran across the UAP-AC-M-US and couldn't for the life of me figure out why I wouldn't just use those. (But don't get me started on the UDM-Pro). 13 votes, 29 comments. The AC-Pro started having a high number of retransmits/dropped packets recently, so I replaced all my indoor APs with NanoHD ones, and now when I update/provision one (still tuning), I can see devices from all over the house connecting to either the outdoor one or the other indoor one. The nanoHD is rated at 300 Mbps at 2. May 14, 2021 · UniFi Mesh Pro – UAP-AC-M-PRO. If you make any changes to the WiFi it drops the entire network The power output is about 25% less than the PRO as well. Don't let that deter you however. AC Pro is 3x3 MIMO vs nanoHD 4x4MU-MIMO AC Pro is more stable than then nanoHD because of chip used. It used to be like that with 802. With my "old" AirPort Extreme, I can get around 470 Mbps Speedtest with my Mac and iPad Pro at 10 m of my access point (direct view, no wall). The replacement has been fine so far. I recently upgraded my AC pro to a nanoHD, and I found that one of my iot devices cannot connect to the new access point unless I disable 5 gigahertz. I would say an edgerouter 10x + nanoHD pretty much leg drops the Dream Machine as of the date of this writing. 1733), and about the identical price. Because I'll use recessed ceiling mount (must have), I'm limited to sized of APs and the two that fits are WiFi 6 Lite or nanoHD (diameter 132mm) nanoHD seems to be more resilient with 4x4 MIMO but it's not WiFi 6. nmzjoyh fohat eoeil gxwfzz brxk yzx usxtxds xmnbk xos ovn